Legal Opinion

State v. Rubenstein

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Section 75 (a) of Chapter 153, General Laws of Oregon of 1921, regulating and protecting fur-bearing animals, provides, among other things:

“Hereafter it shall be unlawful for any person or persons, firm or corporation to engage in the business of buying otter, mink, fisher, marten, muskrat, or the skins or pelts of any other fur-bearing animals, unless such person or persons, firm or corporation shall have first obtained a license from the state game commission. ’ ’

Upon trial sufficient evidence was adduced upon which to base the finding of the trial jury that the defendant was guilty of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CaseOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. BrantonOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State v. EdlundOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State v. ChastainOregon Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Coos Bay v. Aerie No. 538 of Fraternal Order of EaglesOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. MarchOregon Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API