Legal Opinion
Ahmad Issa v. Margaret Bradshaw
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2018No. 15-4147PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case.
The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Therefore, the petition is denied.
2ConcurrenceSutton, Circuit Judge
*873 This en banc petition implicates the recurring tension between deciding cases correctly and delegating decision-making authority to three-judge panels of the court.
In my opinion and with all respect to…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Bristol Reg'l Women's Center v. Herbert Slatery, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- State v. Mark D. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Shoop v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 2022