Legal Opinion

Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1973Published

1Opinion of the Court

512 P.2d 776 (1973)

Icfean REDFIELD, Appellant,

v.

MEAD, JOHNSON & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 15, 1973.

Decided July 19, 1973.

William B. Murray, Portland, filed a brief for appellant.

Paul R. Duden, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Tooze, Kerr & Peterson, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, DENECKE, HOLMAN, TONGUE and BRYSON, JJ.

McALLISTER, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action under the Uniform Commercial Code against the manufacturer of a contraceptive drug to recover damages…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API