Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & Company
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
512 P.2d 776 (1973)
Icfean REDFIELD, Appellant,
v.
MEAD, JOHNSON & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted January 15, 1973.
Decided July 19, 1973.
William B. Murray, Portland, filed a brief for appellant.
Paul R. Duden, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Tooze, Kerr & Peterson, Portland.
Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, DENECKE, HOLMAN, TONGUE and BRYSON, JJ.
McALLISTER, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action under the Uniform Commercial Code against the manufacturer of a contraceptive drug to recover damages…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.