Grand Union Laundry Co. v. Carney
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered November 11, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBausman, J.
This is an action at law tried without jury. Appellant Carney, who previously had been a contract- or, entered into a special partnership with defendant Heady (who has not joined in this appeal) to operate a Turkish bath. Heady had for some years been a barber *328next door, and Harry Okamura, in business as the Eagle Laundry, had long been doing Heady’s laundry work. Carney had no interest in the barber shop. His sole partnership with Heady was in the bath house business. After the latter had existed two or three months, Heady informed Carney that they could get from Okamura a rate of fifty-five…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eilers Music House v. Oriental Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Reichenbach v. SageWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Dwinel v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
- Yatsuyanagi v. ShimamuraWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Erickson v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller Cattle Co. v. MatticeArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa De Siena, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Smith v. Lambert Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Jewett v. Detroit Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Foster v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.