Ambler Realty Co. v. Village of Euclid
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by the Ambler Realty Company against the Village of Euclid, Ohio, and Harry W. Stein, Inspector of Buildings.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENH1AVER, District Judge.
This suit is brought to have declared null and void and enforcement enjoined of Ordinance No. 2812, enacted by the municipal council of the village of Euclid, November 13, 1922, and amended by Ordinances Nos. 3367 and 3368, enacted June 11, 1923. This ordinance is what is popularly called a “zoning ordinance,” i. e., one imposing a variety of restrictions upon the use of land within the village limits. After issue joined, the evidence was taken and submitted in deposition form.
This case is obviously destined to go higher. On appeal in equity cases, a reviewing…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- So. Burl. Cty. NAACP v. Tp. of Mt. LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Township of River Vale v. Town of OrangetownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Mayor of Wilmington v. TurkCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
- Howden v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.