Legal Opinion
Fenn v. Yale University
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 2004No. Civ.A.3:96 CV 736, Civ.A.3:96 CV 990, Civ.A.3:96 CV 1647(CFD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
DRONEY, District Judge.
Pending is plaintiff John B. Fenn’s (“Dr. Fenn” or “Professor Fenn”) Motion to Dismiss defendant Yale University’s (“Yale”) counterclaims and affirmative defenses [Doc. # 438], on the basis of lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. Background
Dr. Fenn brought this action against Yale alleging conversion, theft, tortious interference with business relations, and violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Madey v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019