Brett McNamar v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRETT MCNAMAR, Case No. 25-cv-04819-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 EXPERIAN INFORMATION Re: Dkt. No. 56 SOLUTIONS, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. See Dkt. No. 56 (“Mot.”); 14 Dkt. No. 61 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 62 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for 15 disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For 16 the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.