Legal Opinion

MCKESSON CORPORATION v. AJJARAPU

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 8, 2019No. 3:18-cv-04132Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MCKESSON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 18-4132 v. OPINION JANAKIRAM AJJARAPU, Defendant. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff McKesson Corporation. (ECF No. 26.) Defendant Janakiram Ajjarapu opposes. (ECF No. 32.) The Court has decided the Motion based on the written submissions of the parties, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 78.1(b). For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is granted. BACKGROUND In this case, Plaintiff seeks payment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Curley v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Ted JOSEY, Appellant, v. JOHN R. HOLLINGSWORTH CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API