Legal Opinion

Jones v. Dannenberg Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1900PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Foreclosure of mortgage. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter1 superior court. November term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

The defendant in error filed a petition, under which, a rule nisi issued, to foreclose a mortgage given by the plaintiff in error to secure a promissory note executed by her. It appears-from the petition that the note and mortgage were executed on the 24th day of February, 1897; that one L. Frieden was the payee of the note and the grantee in the deed of mortgage, and that on the 4th day of March, 1897, Frieden sold and delivered the note to-the defendant in error, and, on the same day, transferred, sold, and assigned the mortgage to the same party; and that the note was-for the principal sum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wight v. RindshopfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Rhodes v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Paris v. MoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Southern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Wheaton v. AnsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank v. BuckheitAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Hartman v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Indiana Board of Pharmacy v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Deen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. William Hester Marble Co. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API