Madsen v. Borthick
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
Plaintiffs, depositors of the now defunct Grove Finance Company, sued Mirvin Borthick and W. Smoot Brimhall, former Commissioners of the Utah Department of Financial Institutions, in their personal capacities for gross negligence in carrying out their statutory duties in regulating and monitoring Grove Finance. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Commissioners and dismissed plaintiffs’ claims. We affirm.
This case comes before us on appeal for a third time. The protracted nature of this case calls for a review of the facts and procedural history leading up…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Williams v. MelbyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Beach v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Day v. State Ex Rel. Utah Department of Public SafetyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Cope v. Utah Valley State CollegeUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
- Gilger v. HernandezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.