Legal Opinion

Brixen v. United States

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 27, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00147Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EDMUND J. BRIXEN, Petitioner, ORDER v. 20-cv-147-wmc1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Petitioner Edmund J. Brixen sought relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

following his guilty plea to one count of production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Brixen argued that his conviction was invalid because he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Because Brixen’s motion and the record indicated that he filed his § 2255 motion one day late, I ordered him to show cause why I should…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Carpenter v. DoumaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Charles J. Mayberry v. Michael A. DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Joseph Lombardo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Adell Jones v. Don Hulick, Acting WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API