Brixen v. United States
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EDMUND J. BRIXEN, Petitioner, ORDER v. 20-cv-147-wmc1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Petitioner Edmund J. Brixen sought relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
following his guilty plea to one count of production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Brixen argued that his conviction was invalid because he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Because Brixen’s motion and the record indicated that he filed his § 2255 motion one day late, I ordered him to show cause why I should…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carpenter v. DoumaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Charles J. Mayberry v. Michael A. DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Joseph Lombardo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Adell Jones v. Don Hulick, Acting WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.