Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Novo Nordisk Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 30, 2024No. 3:23-cv-05459Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. C23-5459 BHS 8 et al., ORDER 9 Plaintiff, 10 ex rel. 11 JAMIE SIEGEL M.D., 12 Plaintiff-Relator, 13 v. 14 NOVO NORDISK, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant Novo Nordisk, Inc. (NNI)’s 18 motion to dismiss counts 1, 2, and 7 of qui tam plaintiff/Relator Jamie Siegel’s operative 19 third consolidated complaint. Dkt. 275. 20 I. BACKGROUND NNI is a global healthcare company. Among other products, NNI manufactures 21 and sells a hemophilia drug…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.