Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 1, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 6705PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

OGG, Judge.

This appeal concerns the applicability of A.R.S. § 28-324 to the facts of this case. We hold that the statute renders Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. (Agency) primarily responsible for obtaining and maintaining automobile insurance on vehicles rented to the general public and, accordingly, affirm the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of appellees, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and Kent Chatterton, its insured.

We begin by reviewing the facts and trial court proceedings giving rise to this appeal. On September 5, 1979, Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. AndersenArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. FendlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. O'Malley Lumber Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Lowry v. Tucson Diesel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. RickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. v. SchwindtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Faz v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API