Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bogart
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 17, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6554PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Presiding Judge.
The issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees. The facts are undisputed.
On the date of the automobile accident which triggered this litigation, John May was employed by Xerox as a branch manufacturing consultant. This job required a good deal of travel. On the day in question, May arrived by air in Phoenix and rented an automobile from Hertz Corporation in accordance with instructions from Xerox. Xerox was to reimburse him for the cost of the rental. After various events not relevant to our…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Harbor Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986