Legal Opinion

Charlemagne v. Cain

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 20, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00088Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ANTONIO A. CHARLEMAGNE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00088-SI Petitioner, ORDER TO DISMISS v. BRAD CAIN, Respondent. SIMON, District Judge. This

28 U.S.C. § 2254

habeas corpus case comes before the Court on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (#8) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#1) as moot. For the reasons that follow, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (#8) is granted. BACKGROUND Following Petitioner’s 1985 convictions for Murder and Assault in the Second Degree, the Multnomah County Circuit Court sentenced him to an indeterminate life…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. William G. Gordon, and State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
Gabriel Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles Daryl Gates, Martin Coon, ( 21604) in Both Their Personal and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Debra BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.