Legal Opinion
Dl v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 10, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2005-1437Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) ) DL, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-1437 (RCL) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion [181] to Strike Report and Testimony of Dr. Leonard Cupingood, Along with All Evidence Based Thereon. Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs’ opposition [184] thereto, defendants’ reply brief [190], and plaintiffs’ sur- reply brief [191-2], the Court will deny the motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. PansierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Kim Adams v. Ameritech Services, Inc. And Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc., and Deborah Allard v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Meister, Brenda G. v. Medical EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- 1998-2 Trade Cases P 72,307, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 217 City of Tuscaloosa Municipal Utilities Board of Albertville, Auburn Water Works Board Jasper Water Works and Sewer Board, Inc., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. Jones Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999