City of New Orleans v. Macheca
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Recorder’s Court of New Orleans; Fred. Deibel, Sr., Judge. Charles Macheca was convicted of selling liquor without a license, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
Defendant was charged with a violation of Ordinance No. 12,636, O. S., relafive to selling liquors without license and without permit of city council.
Defendant appeared, and pleaded that said ordinance and Ordinance No. 13,481, O. S., and section 15 of Act 131 of 1902, and 21 of Act No. 45, p. 55, of 1896, were illegal, and unconstitutional, null, and void, for various reasons; and, further, that he had complied with all lawful requirements hy tendering the money for license and procuring the consent of the majority of householders or property holders within the radius fixed hy law, hut that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Town of Mandeville v. BandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. SanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- City of New Orleans v. SmytheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- City of Baton Rouge v. ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Gilmore & Maginnis v. MeekerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905