Legal Opinion
Ogden v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 1983No. 83-CV-0482, 83-CV-0752PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these actions claim that they were wrongfully denied certain retirement benefits, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and Michigan common law. Before the Court is defendants’ motion for partial dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The parties have briefed the issues and have presented oral argument to the Court. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is hereby granted.
The facts as alleged by plaintiffs are as follows. Defendant Michigan Bell…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Fentron Industries, Inc. v. The National Shopmen Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- John Woodfork v. Marine Cooks & Stewards UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Provience v. Valley Clerks Trust FundDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Perry v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Gilbert v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Authier v. GinsbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.