Legal Opinion
Authier v. Ginsberg
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1985No. 83-1674PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants, National Steel Corporation (National), its wholly owned subsidiary, American Steel Corporation (American), and Fred Ginsberg, American’s Chairman, appealed from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff-Appellant, Emery Authier, Jr. The defendants contend that the district court submitted improperly the case to the jury because Authier’s complaint failed to state a cause of action under Michigan law and because, in any event, the action was preempted by Section 514(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennsylvania v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Virgil E. Arrington v. James A. NeusserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-MassengaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fairneny v. Savogran Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Holland v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.