Legal Opinion
Pedden v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 13, 2019No. 11-207Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 11-207C Filed: November 13, 2019 IAIN D. PEDDEN, Keywords: Statutory Plaintiff, Interpretation; Legislative Purpose; Arbitrary and v. Capricious; Promotion; Remand; 10 U.S.C. § 12207; UNITED STATES, RCFC 12(b)(6); Reported Opinion Defendant. Eric Sebastian Montalvo, Federal Practice Group, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff. Michael D. Austin, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., LT Tyson Peter Marx, USN, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, Department of the Navy, of counsel. MEMORANDUM…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.