Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Grass

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1946No. Docket Nos. 58, 59, Calendar Nos. 43,088, 43,089PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiff Carre W. Morrison sues to recover damages for injuries she received when she was struck by defendant’s automobile as she was walking across Grand River avenue in the city of Detroit at the intersection of Prevost avenue. Plaintiff Colin D. Morrison, husband of Carre W. Morrison, sues for damages sustained by him by reason of the injuries to his wife. Verdict in each case was in favor of plaintiff. There were special questions submitted to and answered by the jury. Defendant appeals. The two eases were consolidated for trial and again on appeal.

Grand River avenue is a main-traveled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Petersen v. LundinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Guina v. HarrodMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Moore v. NoorthoekMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Beers v. ArnotMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Haley v. Grosse Ile Rapid Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bias v. AusburyMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Harrison v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
  3. Jones v. SlaughterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Douglas v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Vaas v. SchrotenboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API