Legal Opinion

Perez-Santos v. Malave

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 30, 2001No. 01-1016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Mario Pérez-Santos appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for default judgment against Jose A. Malavé and dismissal of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(c) provides, in relevant part, that “[f]or good cause shown the court may set aside an entry of default.” “After an entry of default, a court may examine a plaintiffs complaint to determine whether it alleges a cause of action. In making that determination it must assume that all well pleaded factual allegations are true.” Quirindongo Pacheco v. Rolon Morales, 953 F.2d 15, 16 (1st Cir. 1992). Review of the district court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-MontanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Benjamin Quirindongo Pacheco v. Jose L. Rolon MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Dana Polchowski v. Melbourne GorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Wren v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Padilla-Ruiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  2. Fetzer v. Cambria County Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Rosado-Montes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  4. LODER v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  5. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API