Legal Opinion

Edwin Medina v. J.P. Keane

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1991No. 1365, Docket 90-2477PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Circuit Judge:

Respondent-appellant J.P. Keane appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Vincent L. Broderick, Judge, granting petitioner-appellee Edwin Medina’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court held that a post-arrest statement made by Medina was elicited in violation of his Miranda rights, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and that the admission of the statement at Medina’s trial was not harmless error. The state argues on this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. HawkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API