Bunting v. Salz
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Alameda County.
1Opinion of the Court
FOOTE, C.
This appeal is taken from the judgment and an order denying a new trial. The appeal from the judgment *195must be dismissed, as it was taken more than one year after the entry of the judgment: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939; Coon v. Grand Lodge, 76 Cal. 354, 18 Pac. 384. The action was to recover $750 damages for the conversion of a wagon by the defendants, which the plaintiff claimed to be her property, and taken without her consent. The defendants Salz and Niehaus, and Trefry, a constable, in their answer denied the allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint, and justified the alleged…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Angell v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Coon v. Grand Lodge of the United Order of Honor of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Williams v. LerchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Sweetland v. Oakley State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Frost v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Milwaukee Building Co. v. WetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928