Legal Opinion

State v. Osman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 30, 2005No. 31371-5-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*578¶1 Semi Osman pleaded guilty to three counts of second degree incest. On appeal, he alleges that the trial court (1) procedurally violated ROW 9.94A.340 and (2) violated his equal protection rights when it considered his status as a noncitizen and his possible deportation status in denying his Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA) request. We find no abuse of discretion or equal protection violation and affirm.

Van Deren, J.

FACTS

¶2 Semi Osman requested a SSOSA sentence after pleading guilty to three counts of second degree incest. Former RCW 9A.64.020(2) (1999). The State opposed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Davisson v. Colville Confederated TribesColville Confederated Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State of Washington v. Daniel Lyle SchrecengostCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API