Legal Opinion

Pease v. Pease

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1988No. B028907PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J.

May a trial court in a civil proceeding give collateral estoppel effect to a criminal conviction involving the same issues if the conviction resulted from a guilty plea? Our Supreme Court instructs us that the answer to this question is an unequivocal “No,” because this would unfairly deprive a party of his right to an adversary proceeding in which to present his case. Because the trial court in this case erroneously arrived at a contrary answer to the question posed here, we must reverse.

Facts

This case began with the filing of a civil complaint against appellant Clarence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Allstate Insurance v. Kim W.California Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. GoodrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Maysonet v. GrandaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API