Pease v. Pease
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
May a trial court in a civil proceeding give collateral estoppel effect to a criminal conviction involving the same issues if the conviction resulted from a guilty plea? Our Supreme Court instructs us that the answer to this question is an unequivocal “No,” because this would unfairly deprive a party of his right to an adversary proceeding in which to present his case. Because the trial court in this case erroneously arrived at a contrary answer to the question posed here, we must reverse.
Facts
This case began with the filing of a civil complaint against appellant Clarence…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Allstate Insurance v. Kim W.California Court of Appeal · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. GoodrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Maysonet v. GrandaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.