Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 14, 2006No. 05-04-01487-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WRIGHT.

Edward Leno Neal appeals his conviction for interference with an emergency telephone call. After the trial court found appellant guilty, it assessed punishment at 270 days’ confinement, probated for eighteen months, and a $300 fine. In two points of error, appellant contends the trial court violated his right to confrontation when it admitted (1) certain testimony by the responding police officer, and (2) the recording of a 911 call. For the following reasons, we overrule appellant’s points of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Background

After…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wright v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Martin Suarez Juarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  4. McCarty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  5. Locken v. LockenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API