Neal v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice WRIGHT.
Edward Leno Neal appeals his conviction for interference with an emergency telephone call. After the trial court found appellant guilty, it assessed punishment at 270 days’ confinement, probated for eighteen months, and a $300 fine. In two points of error, appellant contends the trial court violated his right to confrontation when it admitted (1) certain testimony by the responding police officer, and (2) the recording of a 911 call. For the following reasons, we overrule appellant’s points of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Background
After…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wright v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Martin Suarez Juarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
- McCarty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Locken v. LockenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.