Legal Opinion
Lash v. City of Union, Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 29, 2000No. C-3-98-045PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 29); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING IN PART AND NOT RULING UPON IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #42); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. # 45); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC. #49); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVITS (DOC. #53); FURTHER PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED
RICE, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiffs Connie Lash, Julie Johnson, Carla Edwards, Ronald Kidwell,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ronald Kidwell Julie Johnson and Charles Arnett v. City of Union and John ApplegateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Peraica v. Riverside-Brookside High School District No. 208Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Sherman v. Indian Trails Public Library DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2001
- Kidwell v. City of UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.