In re the Marriage of Kaptur
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
Wife appeals a dissolution judgment, challenging the trial court’s property division. In particular, wife quarrels with two components of the trial court’s property division. First, wife contends that the equalizing payment included in the judgment was too large based on the trial court’s incorrect “finding that the parties had a $33,600 debt on their home.” Wife also asserts that the “court erred in ordering a [Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO)] giving to husband $21,500 from wife’s retirement” accounts. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate and remand the property division and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Charles v. PalomoOregon Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WhitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. OhottoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Hostetler v. HostetlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In re the Marriage of TilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Craven and CravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.