Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jonathan Blades v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2019No. 15-CF-663Published

1DissentBeckwith, Associate Judge

Several clear principles have emerged from the case law on a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. We know that the purpose of this right is to benefit the accused, Gannett Co. v. DePasquale , 443 U.S. 368, 380, 99 S.Ct. 2898, 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979), and that the right is at least as protective as the press and the public's First Amendment right to public trial, Waller v. Georgia , 467 U.S. 39, 46, 104 S.Ct. 2210, 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984). We know that contemporaneous review of court proceedings is critical to the right's protections,1 and that a transcript is therefore not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API