Commonwealth v. Lucret
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
The defendant, a youthful offender, challenges the legality of the combination sentence he received pursuant to G. L. c. 119, § 58(A). He appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief, arguing that the statute is ambiguous and unconstitutionally vague, and that the sentence imposed on *625him is unlawful. We conclude that there is no such infirmity in the statute, and, accordingly, affirm.
Background. Before turning to the particulars of the defendant’s case, we describe the statutory scheme under which he was sentenced. General Laws c. 119, § 58(6), provides in pertinent part…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Commonwealth v. LykusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. DeeranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. AlvarezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. Connor C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AbernathyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. Dejuan Mitchell.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2024
- Commonwealth v. DonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
- Commonwealth v. LindbergMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2020
- Commonwealth v. PerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017