Commonwealth v. Alvarez
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
In this case, we consider challenges to the validity of G. L. c. 94C, § 32J, as inserted by St. 1989, c. 227, § 2, set forth below. This statute, commonly known as the “school zone” statute, establishes a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of not less than two years for any person who violates G. L. c. 94C, §§ 32-32F, or § 321, while within 1,000 feet of a public or private elementary, vocational or secondary school. The statute also provides that lack of knowledge of school boundaries is not a defense in such a case and that the two-year mandatory minimum sentence be served from and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. VickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ChavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.