Legal Opinion
Claseman v. Feeney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 14, 1941No. 33,119PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamms should not issue directing a transfer of the files and records in this case from the district court of Todd county to Sherburne county for trial.
The action is for wrongful death, under Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 9657. Intestate was killed in an automobile collision in Sherburne county on September 16, 1940.- Defendant, a resident of Chicago, Illinois, was the driver of the car claimed to have been the negligent cause of death. Decedent was a resident of Hennepin county at time of death, and the probate court there…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Eickhoff v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Doll v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Olson v. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Panzram v. O'DonnellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- Dunn v. Superior Court of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Rosnow v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Janasko v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.