Legal Opinion

Provine v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1912No. 9908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered June 12, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages to property by reason of the regrade of a street.

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by H. F: Pro-vine against. the city of Seattle and H. W. Hawley and L. C. Lane, copartners as Hawley & Lane, to recover damages resulting from defendants’ wrongful acts in placing earth against plaintiff’s building, causing it to move or slide from its foundation and to be partially destroyed. Plaintiff claimed damages in the sum of $2,892.15 for injuries to the building, and for loss of profits from his business which was necessarily suspended.' The jüry returned a verdict for $1,692.15. Thereafter the defendants interposed separate motions for a new trial, and for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Provine v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ennis v. BanksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lamoon v. Smith Cement Brick Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API