Legal Opinion

United States v. Lonnie Maurice Hill

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2005No. 04-2020PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

Lonnie Maurice Hill appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the district court.

At approximately 1:00 A.M., a store clerk working at the HandiMart convenience store in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, phoned police to report suspicious activity in the store. The store was located in a known area of prostitution and, after observing a woman and a man enter the store’s small restroom, the clerk suspected the two were using the restroom as a place for unlawful sexual activity. The single-person restroom, available for use by either men or women,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Arnzen, III v. Charles PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. State v. NeitzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Owens v. RunionDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
  4. People v. SCHUTTERSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. SCHUTTERSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API