Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Utigard
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1981No. Civ. 20631PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
Mary Lou Utigard (Mary Lou) and four of her adult children appeal from the judgment (writ of execution) which determined that Lawrence A. Utigard (Lawrence) owed Mary Lou, but not the children, over $12,000 in arrearages for child support. The primary issue is whether the children are entitled to enforce support orders issued to their mother to avoid the bar of a statute of limitations applicable to her. We hold that they are not and affirm the judgment.
Facts
Mary Lou and Lawrence separated in 1970 and, in 1971, an interlocutory decree of dissolution was entered; Mary Lou was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wheelright v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. DannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re the Marriage of HooperMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Estate of Spirtos v. One San Bernardino County Superior Court Case Numbered SPR 02211Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Marriage of McNeillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Marriage of LackeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.