Legal Opinion

People v. Freeland

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1963No. Crim. 3383PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Approximately two weeks after a burglary had been committed defendant was accosted by two detectives on a downtown Sacramento street. The time was approximately 11 p.m. One of the officers said: “Mr. Freeland, come with us.’’ They searched his car, then took him to police headquarters and interrogated him. They had neither arrest warrant nor search warrant. The officers questioned defendant intermittently for several hours. They had another suspect in another room and moved back and forth, questioning defendant and the other person regarding the burglary which had taken place two weeks…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. BilderbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Lacefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. State v. KitashiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API