Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vanover

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal by the Commonwealth is from a decision of the Court of Appeals that statements given at the police post and jail by Vanover were the result of inculpa-tory statements made in a police cruiser and should not have been admitted into evidence.

The sole issue is whether the trial court committed reversible error in admitting the evidence of Vanover’s initial confession.

A Perry Circuit Court jury found Van-over guilty of second-degree burglary and theft by unlawful taking over $100, and sentenced him to a total of 6 years. On appeal, Vanover’s conviction was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Creech v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  4. Douglas v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Shadoan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Roberts v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Buster v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Taylor v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Taylor v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API