Legal Opinion

Buster v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2012No. 2011-SC-000002-MR, 2011-SC-000005-MRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice NOBLE.

Appellant Patricia Buster entered a conditional guilty plea to four counts of complicity to first-degree rape. Appellant’s conditional guilty plea preserved her right to appeal the adverse ruling of the trial court on her motion to suppress her written confession. This Court finds that Appellant did not voluntarily waive her Miranda rights, and therefore the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress is reversed. Appellant’s conviction is vacated and this case is remanded to the trial court so that the Appellant can withdraw her guilty plea.

I.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Mills v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dillon v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Henderson v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. N.C. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Dillard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API