Legal Opinion

Mizell v. K-Mart Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1991No. 9018SC969Published

1Opinion of the Court

406 S.E.2d 310 (1991)

103 N.C. App. 570

William H. MIZELL, Plaintiff,

v.

K-MART CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. 9018SC969.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 6, 1991.

Spencer W. White, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts by Clinton Eudy, Jr., and Amiel J. Rossabi, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff argues that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the liquid remained on the floor for such a length of time that defendant…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API