Legal Opinion
Lee v. Bates
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 13, 2005No. 100,706PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The question presented on certiorari is whether COCA erred when it affirmed the trial judge’s order dismissing the cause for improper venue. We answer in the affirmative.
I
ANATOMY OF THE LITIGATION
¶ 2 Randle and Janell Duncan (plaintiffs or Duncans), residents of Canadian County, are former clients of Julie Bates (Bates), of the law firm of Postic and Bates (defendants, firm or Postic & Bates), whose office is located in Cleveland County. On or about 23 February 2003 Janell Duncan, while at home in Canadian County, contacted Bates, at her home in Cleveland County, concerning a possible…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Miller v. Kendall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spencer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- VAN WINKLE v. YBAR, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Morris v. HeinzCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- SMITH v. HAMMOND & ASSOCIATESCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- A.B. STILL WEL-SERVICE v. ANTINUM MIDCON ICourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.