Legal Opinion
Schlosky v. Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1982No. 82CA0288PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
The plaintiffs, Kenneth E. and Merlyn M. Schlosky, appeal the judgment of the trial court dismissing their amended complaint for failure to state claims upon which relief could be granted. A judgment was entered against the defendant Buchanan, and he is not a party to this appeal. The defendant, Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc., cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of its request for attorneys’ fees under the provisions of § 13-17-101, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.), and seeks attorneys’ fees on appeal under § 13-17-103, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.). We affirm.
The plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Aztec Sound Corp. v. Western States Leasing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Kalamath Investment Co. v. Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- McNichols v. CONEJOS-K CORPORATIONColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Rogers Concrete, Inc. v. Jude ContractorsColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- People v. GallegosColorado Court of Appeals · 1995