Legal Opinion

Yiamouyiannis v. Thompson

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 30, 1988No. 04-87-00673-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PEEPLES, Justice.

In this libel case, plaintiff appeals a summary judgment granted on the ground that the defendants’ statements were constitutionally protected opinions and not actionable assertions of fact. Plaintiff also complains of certain discovery orders. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

During a referendum campaign in 1985 to authorize fluoridated water in San Antonio, plaintiff John Yiamouyiannis publicly opposed the fluoridation effort, and defendant Paul Thompson questioned his credentials and expertise in the San Antonio Express-News. 1 Thompson called…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Chessher v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Burch v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Schauer v. Memorial Care Systems, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Vice v. Kasprzak, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  4. Einhorn v. LaChance, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. American Broadcasting Companies v. Gill, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API