Legal Opinion

Howland v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 14, 1964No. C.D. 2497PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two protests involve certain wooden shutters, which were assessed with duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, for window blinds, wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for. Plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is properly dutiable at only 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52373 and T.D. 52476, as manufactures of wood, not specially provided for.

At the time of trial,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Cartier (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howland v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API