Legal Opinion

Rockwell v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1998No. 96-07-11172A & 96-06-11156E CA A97048 (Control) & CA A98205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

In this consolidated proceeding, appellants Nelson and Pacey appeal from a judgment denying their claim for specific performance of an option agreement and affirming a justice court judgment in favor of respondent on her Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) action. We reverse.

Both the facts and procedural history are convoluted. Respondent is the owner of a residence in Hines. In May 1995, respondent and appellants signed a lease/option agreement under which appellants would pay rent in the amount of $485 a month. Appellants were to repair the garage roof and reroof the house at their expense.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Percy v. MILLEROregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Herndon v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Voin v. SzaboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Thompson v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Adamson v. ThrallOregon Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burgess v. North Bend School District 13Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API