Herndon v. Armstrong
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this case, the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the same grounds as in Winter v. Heyden, 149 Or. — (36 P. (2d) 183), just decided. The facts are substantially the same in both cases and the same rules of law are controlling in both easés. The motion to dismiss must, therefore, be denied and the appellant will be permitted to substitute certified copies thereof in lieu of the original notice of appeal, undertaking on appeal and judgment appealed from, as in the Winter case, and it is so ordered.
Argued on the merits at Pendleton October 30; affirmed November 27, 1934
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Winter v. HeydenOregon Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by14 opinions
- Killam v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- The Texas Co. v. BUTLEROregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Chef Joe's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Larson v. TrachselOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Lakeview Drilling Co. v. STARKOregon Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.