Legal Opinion
Carter v. Bourgoin Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 6, 2015No. 20140405-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
ROTH, Judge:.T 1 Gayle and Lanett Carter (the Carters) appeal the district court's denial of their motion to amend their complaint. 'We affirm.
T2 In 2008, A. Kent Cottam contracted with Landmark Testing & Engineering, Inc. (Landmark) to perform a geotechnical investigation on a parcel of land he was considering purchasing in Washington, Utah, Landmark tested the soil for both expansive and collapsible soils. Based on the results of the. report, Cottam went forward with the purchase of the land which was then subdivided into residential lots. One of these lots was sold to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First City Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association v. Air Capitol Aircraft Sales, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Gary R. Morgan, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Kelly v. Hard Money Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Sunridge Development Corp. v. RB & G Engineering, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- FAILOR v. MegaDYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michelle Dalen v. St. John Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Prime Group Inc v. DixonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Smallman v. MGM Resorts InternationalDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- State v. NeslerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020