Legal Opinion
People v. Blake
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the trial court failed to deliver a sufficiently detailed identification charge was not preserved for appellate review, as no timely objection was *667registered at the trial (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Beasley, 114 AD2d 415, 416). In any event, the record reveals that the question of the defendant’s guilt hinged largely upon the credibility of the People’s witnesses, and not upon the nature and quality of their observations of the defendant during the commission of the crime. Accordingly, the defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a comprehensive charge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BeasleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. HarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BronsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. FloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. EligiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.