Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Wood

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Trial in the Circuit Court of Moul- ■ trie County; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge, presiding. Verdict for plaintiff on balance of note after deducting usury, etc., and judgment accordingly. Appeal by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harker

This is a suit upon a promissory note for $333.50, executed by appellees to M. T. Sheppard and assigned by him to appellant before maturity. The defense interposed was that the note was a renewal of former notes given on a contract for a usurious rate of interest, and that appellant had notice of the usury before taking the note. The defense prevailed and judgment was recovered for $159 only. The usury is admitted and the only question submitted for our consideration is whether appellant had notice of it.

The evidence shows that M. T. Sheppard is a banker at Lovington, Illinois; that appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. YerkesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  2. First National Bank v. DunbarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Libby v. PelhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API