Conley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma 'County; William H. Zwick, Judge. Ed Conley and Charles Clift were each convicted of unlawfully conspiring to commit the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, their motion for new trial was overruled, and they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The plaintiffs in error, Ed Conley and Charlie Clift, hereinafter styled defendants, were, informed against for the offense of unlawfully, willfully, and corruptly combining, confederating, conspiring, • and agreeing together and with each other to commit a crime, that of willfully and unlawfully selling spirituous and malt liquors, and each convicted, and each of said defendants sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail of Oklahoma county, Okla., for a period of one year, and each to pay a fine of $500. Defendants’ motion for a new trial being overruled, they bring error to this court.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Starr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BennettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- Creek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919